Wednesday, 16 March 2016

Critical analysis of Achebe’s "Things Fall Apart"

Assignment

                Course No.: 14 [The African Literature]
                                                                                                Batch: 2014-16

Name: Vanita Tadha
Roll No.: 30
Qualification: MA Part–2 [Sem-4]
Enrollment No.: Pg14101029    
Submitted to: Department of English [Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University, Gujarat, India.]


 Assignment on Critical analysis of Things Fall Apart


Things Fall Apart is a post-colonial novel written by Nigerian novelist Chinua Achebe in 1958. He is a novelist, essayist, poet, short story writer and children’s writer. The title of the novel is taken from Second coming by W. B. Yeats. This novel provides history of time when crisis and anxiety was prevalent. Achebe traces on life in the Igbo village of Umuofia in Nigeria. She presented African culture with the help of limited character which covers whole Africa. People are suppressed and oppress by colonialist. They are living in worth condition and even you won’t see the survival of woman (that type of condition of women) in Africa. Througoht the novel people are struggling with own people as well as colonialist.

Many novels, poems, articles, and such things are written before this novel, for example Heart of Darkness, it shows the hugely face of African black people. Colonialist or especially European see them as they are born to treat African. African people are mere an object or the worst animal of the world according to colonialist. It indicates pre and post-colonial time. This is a first novel by African novelist catch up the eyes of the world.

The novel is split into three parts:

1)     Okonkwo’s family and personal history, the custom and society of the Igbo

2)   & 3) Describing the influence of British colonialism and Christian missionaries on the Igbo community.

Narrative technique

The language of the novel is simple but dignified. He used elevated language to provide the real image of Igbo culture. His first sentence has a mere 11 words and goes as follows 'Okonkwo was well known throughout the nine villages and even beyond'. Within these short sentences, Achebe explains an incredible amount of information required to understand the text. His simple language gives the voice to native people of Africa as they himself are speaking and it was his desire to make sound like Igbo uses. The images that are used are entire Igbo community.

Achebe uses third person narrative like he or she to show the concern of language and it also suggest that character are interact each other and tell their own words from their perspective. Anothere interesting thing is past narration which tells that things are happened and it will may happen in future so it challenge the people of Europe.

Another aspect is as the story enriches character becoming dark and violent. First story begins with Okonkow’s point of view but letter on it shift on past and present condition of Africa.

Okonkwo, throughout his life he struggle for his community as well as for himself to become successful, powerful or the lord of Igbo. His violence hatred becomes one of reason for his failure. For Okonkwo, the conflict between private self and public man is the conflict between the feminine and masculine principles.

This novel revolves around violence, hatred, generation gap, two different cultures; language is a sign of different culture etc. Finally, the point of view shifts to the District Commissioner's perspective, and it is his perspective that closes the novel, perhaps mirroring the way that traditional cultural values and power were displaced by European colonialism. Read from 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

Reflections on Post-Colonialism


Post colonialism means after colonialism o after independence or it express opposite idea of colonialism. Post colonialism is a consequence of colonialism. Through the novel “The Things Fall Apart” Achebe focused on colonialism in which he grew up. It makes her to write and educate the people of Africa. Achebe writes back at the writing of European writers and the misrepresentation of Africa in their writing. Post-colonial writers usually write about how their rich culture destroyed under the power of imperialism.
If both writer work together and put their difference aside they surely bound to overcome the pain of losing their culture. However, the literature does not show the colonized as victims of colonialism, but rather it shows that they are confused about their sense of belonging. Most colonized individuals do not know whether to follow their own culture or the culture of colonizes. In the two cultures they are struggling for their identity. Read from  1, 2

Generation gap

Dirty picture of old generation represent illiteracy of back generation. Newer is always smarter than older one” because older are investing and new are completing remaining things with new idea. Here same protagonist Okonkwo’s father Unoka is lazy and wasteful man. He wants to be a traditional and his son also follows his way of living life instead of being missionaries. He doesn’t see the failure of himself. He was borrowing money from others and merry making with the friends and his family as children and wife are suffering from starvations. He doesn’t mind with that all. He gives more important to his land so he tells his son to work in land but Okonkwo is clever and understands the colonialism from which they are suffering so he wants to be an ideal man.
Because Okonkwo is a leader of his community he is asked to take care for a young boy named Ikemefuna, who is given to the village as a peace offering by neighboring Mbaino to avoid war with Umuofia. Ikmefuna and Okonkwo’s son Nwoye is friend. These two are representing another generation. They are children so they constructed or suppress by parents and want have choice. Okonkwo is not happy with father and son because son is not exact image of himself and his daughter is his image but he wants her as son rather than girl. Achebe looked Africa from inside.

He loves Ikemefuna more than Nwoye. Once community forced to kill Ikemefuna so Okonkwo took him outside the village and kill him. He was upset and unable to sleep for few days but he didn’t realize to other. Nwoye has Christian name and use to visit church which gives pain to Okonkwo. Out of frustration he starts beating his wife. He has three wives which show his richness.

 No doubt he is a worrier of the land but he uses his power in home also so it provokes domestic violence. Through beating children and wife he is showing his individual’s authority in home as well as in community. He lives for community rather than family or individual.

The struggle between change and tradition (clash of culture)

As the novel is on culture on the verge of change than there definatly two culture which defines differently. It can also say that fight or conflict between colonialism and traditional societies. The tension about whether change should be privilege over tradition or it shoud be goes onwards. To some extent, Okonkwo’s resistance of cultural change is also due to his fear of losing societal status. His self-appreciation depend on the cultural effect because if British start over powering African than it is possibility of losing culture. As colonizers believe that African have no value no power than how can they give high status to Okonkwo.

The struggle of the hero, Okonkwo indicates importance of his own culture in front of British. His fight with the culture is mere the fight with his life
This system of evaluating the self inspires many of the clan’s outcasts to embrace Christianity. Okonwo’s son Nwoye wants to accept Christianity and Christian stand for Europeans. Nwoye and many of the villagers are excited about the new opportunities and techniques that the missionaries bring.
This European influence, however, threatens to extinguish the need for the mastery of traditional methods of farming, harvesting, building, and cooking. These traditional methods, once crucial for survival, are now, to varying degrees, dispensable. Throughout the novel, Achebe shows how dependent such traditions are upon storytelling and language and thus how quickly the abandonment of the Igbo language for English could lead to the eradication of these traditions.

Condition of women (gender discrimination)



Women are mere an object in male dominate community. Igbo community also gives important to male. Majority people have two or more wife so they think women are mere a key toy. Women are the object which shows the richness of any men. Women are exploiting by man.  If any woman try to raise her voice than it won’t seem fare and people start abuse or torture to her so automatically she will lose her everything.

They won’t have choice and that’s why they are suffering. Okonkwo has a daughter named Ezinma. She is intellectual and real image of him but he wants every quality of that girl in his son so he can feel better. Achebe criticize that this is not the real power of any human of the word to beat his wife or to keep wife under his control.  He also talks about the mind power which is in limitation. People are living in a frame and that frame is decorated by such duplicate row materials so it ever changing. Ezinma harassed by her in lows so she comes back to home but her husband want her back.

Okonkow suffering from frustration and that’s why he started rudely behave with his wives. He realizes the loosing of power therefore he believes getting power by suppressing women. Women have to live under the home and it is the world for them. How can women get views to raise her voice because they are in a box which never opens for them and if open than it is in limitation. Read from 1, 2, 3, 4.

Religion

Religion plays vital role in this novel. First we need to understand the meaning of religion because it can interpret in various ways. For Okonkwo religion is to beat children and wives. Whatever he is doing for his self or for community is his religion. Women have to live in home and do household that is her religion.
Christian is real religion in the novel. It gives the glimpse of post colonialism because it relates with Europe and European are considering colonizer. People have conflict between two religion one is own and another one is Christian. Nwoye like to convert his religion as Christian but his father stick to his own. Nwoye changed his name in Christian and visiting Church which his father dislikes. Read from 1, 2.

Conclusion

To summing up we can say that Achebe’s intention of writing this novel is to differentiate the things which are spread in Africa. How British are came and start ruling over Africa. He want to make realize to African that because of imperialism and colonialism how their culture is downfallen. Tut newer is satisfied here is not any rich culture but the people are constructing it rich. Older generation was rigid but new one is satisfied with new rules and regulation so it is the reason of destroying their culture. The condition of women is unimaginable because of masculine power over women. Okonkwo and his father’ Unoka is the example of masculine power. They are treating their wife as an object. Okonkwo has a beautiful and clever daughter with his all quality but he prefer boy child more than girl so he thinks that she must be boy instead of girl. Finally he covers worldwide attention that black or African is not always violet but it is white who make them to evoke.

Works Cited


homework help. (2012, 1 24). http://www.enotes.com/homework-help/things-fall-apart-by-chinua-achebe-what-narrative-309646. Retrieved from http://www.enotes.com/
Mark by Teachers. (n.d.). http://www.markedbyteachers.com/meet-the-team/. Retrieved from http://www.markedbyteachers.com/
Morgan, K. (2006). http://classroom.synonym.com/narrative-technique-achebes-things-fall-apart-21488.html. Retrieved from http://classroom.synonym.com




Friday, 30 October 2015

My Presentation

BATCH:2014-2016,   SEM-3, MY PRESENTATION
Paper No.:9 (The Modernist Literature)
Title: Myths in 'The Waste Land'

To evaluate my presentation, click here


Myth in 'The Waste Land' from Department of English


BATCH:2014-2016,   SEM-3, MY PRESENTATION
Paper No.:10 (The American Literature)
Title: Theme of Poe's Short Story

To evaluate my presentation, click here


Theme of Poe's short story from Department of English


BATCH:2014-2016,   SEM-3, MY PRESENTATION
Paper No.:11 (The Post-colonial Literature)
Title: Comparison between Caliban and Friday

To evaluate my presentation, click here

Comparision between Caliban and Friday from Department of English


BATCH:2014-2016,   SEM-3, MY PRESENTATION
Paper No.:11 (English Language Teaching)
Title: Difference between CLT and ALT

To evaluate my presentation, click here



Wednesday, 14 October 2015

Ania Loomba’s views about Colonialism/Post colonialism and selected term

Ania Loomba’s views about Colonialism/Post colonialism and selected term

Name: Vanita P. Tadha
Class: MA SEM-3
Roll No.: 30        Year: 2015
Enrolment No.: pg14101029
Paper No.: 11[The Postcolonial Literature]
Submitted to: Department of English

To evaluate my assignment click here


Ania Loomba’s views about Colonialism/Post colonialism and selected term


Introduction

She received her BA, MA, and M.Phill degrees from the Delhi University. She researches and teaches early modern literature, history of race and colonialism, post colonialism studies, feminist theory and contemporary Indian literature.
Before we go further reading we must race the term ‘Colonialism’. It’s related with colony.  According to Oxford English Dictionary the meaning of colony is
‘A country under the control of another and occupied by settlers from there’
Colony creates two another terms

                                                         Colony


    Colonizer                                                         Colonized

First world country rule over another third world country and make them inferior, subaltern or slave and ruler of this is known as colonizers and transform them in to their culture it means ‘colonized’.
Colonialism/Post colonialism began with the ending of 20th century or after pos war. Its roots were in the Columbus arrival for the new found land and with the Vasco de Gama. There is not much difference between colonialism and post colonialism both sit together.

Colonial/Postcolonial writers

Chinua Achebe, Althusser, Ascraft, Griffiths Baudrillard, Homi K. Bhabha, Cessaire, Gaytri Chakravorty Spivak, Franz Fanon, Gramasci, Mahasweta Devi, Shashi Tharu, Thiango, Ania loomba etc.

Some prominent writers of the colonial/postcolonial writings

Ania Loomba: Ania Loomba is Catherine Bryson professor in the field of English at the Pennsylvania. Her popular works are:
1.       ‘Gender’ Race, Renaissance drama.
2.       ‘Dead Woman Tell no Tales: Issues of Female subjectivity’.
3.       ‘Shakespeare, Race and colonialism (2002)
4.       ‘postcolonial’ studies and Beyond (2005)

Althusser (1971): His work ’Lenin and philosophy and other essay also translated.

 The term colonialism, according to Oxford English Dictionary comes from the Roman term ‘colonai’ which means ‘farm’ or ‘settlement’. It means Roman settled in other lands but still they are craving for their own land. The Oxford English Dictionary defined as

“A settlement in a new country… a body of people who settle in a new locality, forming a community so formed, consisting of the original settlers and their descendants and successors as long as the connection with the parent state is kept up”.

Ania Loomba’s book ‘colonialism/post colonialism is divided in to three part. She mainly discussed about how ‘colonialism’ relevant with the person, place and things.

Ania Loomba discuss such term like

Imperialism

The ‘OED’ defines ‘imperial’ as ‘Pertaining to empire’ and ‘imperialism’ as the rule of an arbitrary king is ruling over a small area. This word coined by British Prime Minister Benjamin in Disraeli in 1870s. And Joseph chamberlain support of the movement.

Colonial discourse

About this theory Homi Bhabha has given his views in 1980 that it dealt with heredity, ambiovalalence and mimicry. While Foucault o, this discourse, is the complex of signs and practices that organize social existence and social reproduction in colonial discourse. It is related with Edward Said’s ‘Orientalism’. It focused on the knowledge of powerful people.
For Ex: British rule over India. They had technological knowledge through which they made us     powerless.

Race

It is about two categories. One on power and another one is suppress by it. Without one we can’t recognize other one.
Such race:
Boy – Girl
Day – Night
White – Black
Good – Bad
It provokes discourse among people.

Class

Class and caste system often creates difference in the human beings.
For Ex: In India a boy is well set, well educated, good looking then even parents of girl not allow them to marry with that boy just because he is belong to the lower cast.

Hybridity

Colonialism/Post colonialism is also one kind of hybridity.  To accept hybrid life is often problematic. Hybridity refers in its most basic sense to mixture. Hybridity is journey from biological to cultural discussion.

Globalization

It is not emphasize on any particular country or culture. It is a combination of multi – culture. Somewhere in the process of ‘Globalization’ also near to colonialism. Globalization and social networking makes people together or connect with link. And such things like language, food, thought, clothes and many more things in which people can be broad minded.

Post-Modernism

Post-Modernism is influential over modernity. This word first used by Leotard in 1930 in his work ‘answering the question: what is Postmodernism?

Selected term

Anti – colonialism

In the second half of the twentieth century, anti – colonialism was often articulated in term of a radical, Marxist discourse of liberation. Anti – colonialism has taken many forms in different colonial situations: it is sometimes associated with an ideology of racial liberation. It emphasizes the need to reject colonial power and restore local control. This term especially focus on particular anti culture which people prefer to turn back. It is a kind of political struggle between colonizes people and anti colonizes.

Decolonization

Decolonization is the process of revealing and dismantling colonialist power in all its form. This includes dismantling the hidden aspects of those institutional and cultural forces that had maintained the colonialist power and that remain even after political independence is achieved.

Exotic/Exoticism

The word exotic was first used in 1599 to mean ‘alien’. It introduce from abroad, not indigenous. The key concept her is the introduction of the exotic from abroad in to a domestic economy. It is also consider as foreign. In the earlier days of European put exotic in artifacts, plants and animals. European dreamed to have exotic for to be exhibited themselves.

Hegemony

Hegemony is initially a term referring to the dominance of one state. This broader meaning was coined and popularized in the 1930s by Italian Marxist Antonia Gramasci. He investigates why the ruling class is so successful in promoting its own interest in society. Hegemony is the power of the ruling class to convince other classes that their interest is the interest of all. Though such medium dominant class makes other class to follow them and what they are doing is right.

Magic realism

This term first used I postcolonial context I the foundation essay by Jacques Stephen Alexis ‘of the magical realism of the Haitians’. This term popularized when it was employed to characterize the work of South American writers widely translated into English and other languages.
Example:
1] Midnight’s children   -Salman Rushdie
2] The Famished Road    - Ben Okri
3] The Bone people
4] Green Grass, Ruin Water

Subaltern

It is near to savage. Subalterns are a term adopted by Antonio Gramasci Subaltern means ‘to inferior’. It refers to those groups in society who are the subject of hegemony of the ruling classes. Subaltern classes may include peasants, workers and other lower class people. They are not able to rise their voice against dominant. They are not always poor in term of money or physically but by their work and class.

Ideology

Ideology in the Althusserian sense is “the imaginary relation to the conditions of existence”. It can be described as a set of conscious and unconscious ideas which make up one’s goals, expectation, and motivations. It is a set of standards that are followed by people, government and or other groups that is considered the ‘norm’.
It is a way of looking at things, as argued in several philosophical lenience. It can also be a set of ideas proposed by the dominant class of society to all members of society.

Modernism and Post colonialism

Modernism is a twentieth century European movement in the creative art. Modernism is usually defined as a European movement and it has been argued that the encounter with African culture I the so – called ‘scramble for Africa’. The European powers were engaged in violently suppressing the ‘savage’ culture of Africa. European sees African as pig. They keep them as their slave.

Conclusion

Ania Loomba is famous for postcolonial literature. She has researched on race, c colonial terms. Post colonialism, postcolonial study and feminist theory. Post colonial term helpful to understand the culture of any particular area. The culture is goes on changing. Postcolonial literature belongs to the time in which other colonies establish over native people. Anti – colonialism, hegemony, subaltern and exoticism are the post

 






Duality of language

Duality of language

Name: Vanita P. Tadha
Class: MA SEM – 3
Roll No. : 30      Year: 2015
Enrolment No.: pg14101029
Paper No.: 12 [English Language Teaching]
Submitted to: Department of English

To evaluate my assignment, click here

Duality of language


Duality: The quality or condition of being dual.
.
Language: The system of communication used by a particular community or country.

What is duality of language?

Languages have multi-side in its nature. The style of writing is different than speaking. The way of understanding is also differ like direct and indirect method.

Here I am focusing on duality of understanding the style of language. The language is esoteric.  It can be interpreted in different way. There are so many languages in the world. It is manmade. Sometimes it betrays us. It has such kind of power and without it a man cannot sustain in the world. If a person doesn’t know the sound or verbal of language than they have such kind of gesture and expression through which they communicate.

The language is very important in life. It helps us to understand other people but it also cheats us. If we have language power than we can win others otherwise can’t.

Any language is a kind of tool or a medium through which we can express our thought, expression, ideas, emotion etc. Sometimes it’s a kind of wooden toy through which we are playing.

Duality of language in literature

1] Direct way to understand
2] Indirect way to understand

1] Direct way to understand

Language have layer to understand. Whatever read and direct without any evidence or theory we can understand is known as direct method of understanding.

If any poet is writing a poem in direct way than he/she emphasize on straight object related to their subject.

For Ex: A poet is writing about love than he will choose two people, roes and such things. He/she will write in simple way. They don’t need to go for other element like far fetched images.

“Language o man is the language of poetry”

Wordsworth focuses on language when he was writing poetry.Wordsworth argued that poetry should be written in the real language of common man, rather than in the lofty and elaborate dictions that were then considered “poetic”.

The language of conversation in the middle and classes of society is adapted to the purpose of poetic pleasure. Such men communicate with the best objects from which the best part of language is originally derived.

People convey their feelings and notions in simple and unelaborated expression.
Wordsworth focus on simple language rather than philosophical. The language of poetry should be the language ‘really used by men’, but it should be a section’ of such language. He is on the side of simple language that a common man can read it without any evidence.

Literary text: It’s a simple interpretation.

1] Hamlet: Prince of Denmark. He was mad and that’s why he was sent to England. He has no sense so he ever disturbing to other like Claudius, his uncle and Gertrude his mother. Even he said
 “Filthy thy name is woman”
Woman is always fraud to man. All women are equal. In his madness he spoke
“Forty thousand brothers cannot equal to one lover”
He loves too much to Ophelia but after her death.

2] To the Lighthouse: Mrs. Ramsey is protagonist of the novel. She loves too much to her family. She is a faithful wife or a house maker and that’s why she is doing everything for her family. She is playing her role as a good wife or mother.
Lily Briscoe is a painter and she is painting of Mr. and Mrs. Ramsey’s family.

3] Robinson Crusoe: Robinson Crusoe wants to be a master. He starts his sea journey. He founds an island, there is no human being. He becomes a master of that island. He gets everything like land, power and mastery.

4] Harry Ape: Majority characters belong to lower class. They are doing their duty in ship. They are drinking beer and enjoying their life.

5] The Bluest Eye: A girl Pecola wants blue eye and therefore she is doing anything for blue eye. At last she dies because she doesn’t get blue eye.

In these examples we find that each has their simple or direct meaning. It provides basic understanding to the mind. If we goes on reading than there is no need to read twice or thrice and no necessary to goes in deep in this method. We can get the simple meaning through reading. Direct suggestion anyone can understand.

Chetan Bhagat’s entire novels are written in simple way. It’s about young generation. It is for entertainment.

2] Indirect way to understand:

Sometimes such things are not understand well or looking attractive in direct method than we have to choose indirect method to convey our message.

The language is highly elevated. It is not understand by all. Sometimes we need such kind of theory to understand. Many times words and meanings are contextual. If we doesn’t know context or evidence than we may fail to get right conclusion.

For Ex:
1.       Teacher:  What is the chemical formula of water?
Student: H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O.
Teacher: What are you talking about?
Student: Yesterday you said it’s H to O.

2.       Why did the car have a stomachache?
         It had too much gas!

3.       Is it better to do homework on an empty stomach or full stomach?  
        Neither! It’s better to do your homework on paper!

In these examples questions and answer are right but the context is different so answer will be wrong.

Literary text:  In deep way

1] Hamlet: In actually he is not mad. He is taking reaction of action. He has strong mind therefore he think a lot and then he takes action. His mother is responsible for his action. He wants to know reality and that’s why he is acting like mad.
He is a philosopher still he is searching his answers in the world. He will be the prince of Denmark so he taking every action by contemplates. There is always hidden meaning behind his action.

2] Tom Jones: Henry Fielding presents how a bad character can be a good. Tom has many affairs but through his good work he becomes a good character throughout the novel.

3] Waiting For Godot: There are two characters. Both are good in their way. Vladimir is strong with mind power where as Estragon with his physicality. They are acting as a common man. If we only focus on writing then we find it as meaningless but it has too much deep meaning. They are representing the life of every (common) human being. Estragon is a simple man. He ever forgets every incident. He is doing nothing whereas Vladimir has intellectual power. He is representing the life of philosopher.
They are waiting for Mr. Godot. Instead of him a messenger boy comes to passes the message of Mr. Godot. He speaks as he will definitely come tomorrow. Ultimate it means we are waiting for death. Life is without a single meaning.

4] Mourning Becomes Electra: This play is about the manon family. It is an ambiguous. The family belongs to upper middle class. They prefer to joint army. Ezra comes back from army to home. He comes to know about the relation or affair of his wife to other man.  He becomes weak. He dies and his death is an ambiguous. Who is real responsible for his death Levinia or Christine?
Somewhere looks are similar of some characters like Livonia and her mother Christine and, Orin and his father Ezra and Adam Band.
 Orin killed Adam because he wants her mother’s attention. He says to Christine that I will make you happy. May wants to relax and society is not ready to accept them so they went to Island. Somehow Christine is suicide. Orin and Levinia come back to home. Orin also get suicide. Levinia remains at home. She prefer to dead life.

5] The Old Man and The Sea: This is a story of Old man. He went too far in sea. He is at old age still he wants to achieve something. It has deep meaning that old is wise and he has many experience. He is a fisherman. He has too much hope and desire.

He struggle a lot but he success to catch huge fish Marlin. He wishes for youth. He believes that ‘a man can be destroyed but not defeated’. When he reached at home at that time only remain the rubbish of fish.

Conclusion

So, the direct method of understanding any language and Indirect method of understanding any language is different. In direct method we need to focus on word and indirect method we need such theory and contextual meaning. As in example of direct method we can get the simple meaning and in indirect we need to go in deep otherwise we may fail to understand the real theme message or purpose of story. These both methods are the dual side of language. Without these both we can’t understand any story.









 











Nothingness and meaninglessness of life in ’Waiting For Godot’


Nothingness and meaninglessness of life in ’Waiting For Godot’

Name: Vanita P. Tadha
Class: MA SEM-3
Roll No.: 30        Year: 2015
Enrolment No.: pg14101029
Paper No.: 9[The Modernist Literature]
Submitted to: Department of English

To evaluate my assignment, click here


Nothingness and meaninglessness of life in ’Waiting For Godot’

Samuel Beckett

Samuel Beckett was born I Dublin in 1906. He befriended the famous Irish novelist James Joyce, and his first published work was an essay on Joyce. In 1951 and 1953, Beckett wrote his most famous novels, the trilogy Molloy, Malone Dies, and The Unnamable.
Waiting for Godot Beckett’s first play, was written originally in French in 1948. Beckett himself translated in to English. This play began Beckett’s association with the Theater of the Absurd, which influenced later playwrights like Harold Pinter and Tom Stoppard. The most famous Beckett’s play are Endgame (1958) and Krapp’s Last Tape (1959), Breath (1969), a thirty-second play. He was awarded the noble prize in 1969 and died in 1989 in Paris. (Beckett, 1950)

Nothingness and meaninglessness of life in ’Waiting For Godot’

‘Nothing to be done’

The play starts with negative connotation. A country road.  A tree Evening is the setting of the play. This setting is lifeless and ambiguous in term of religion. There are two tramp characters that cover the whole society. Their personality is totally different.

Two tramps have were a different prop which signifies the mentality of people. Vladimir wore hate which symbolizes the mastership, intellectuality and philosophy. Estragon has wear boots, which indicates the slavishness, and physical body structure. These both are different aspect of life but there is nothingness in life. If you go on searching knowledge or provide everything to body like food, sex and live happy but what it makes different?

Life is endless and we go on adding. One side play is insignificant and on other side it gives the root of life. They are passing their time by doing such things. These things is goes on repeating and it is meaningless.

 Waiting is a meaningless act. We all are waiting for such things. Our expectation is endless. If one thing get then we wait for next one but which is the ultimate thing for we wait?

In the play two characters Vladimir and Estragon are waiting for Mr. Godot. They do not aware about Mr. Godot like who is? How he looks? What he is doing? What will happen if Mr. Godot come?  They have only a kind of acquaintances.

Godot is a kind of desire, desire for death or success. It is a unfulfilled wish. It can be a subject of the play. It is an invisible and significant character of the play.

Estragon and Vladimir wants to go but they don’t move an inch because they are waiting for Godot.  They just are passing their time for waiting. They thought Godot will come tomorrow but tomorrow never comes. They want to suicide but they expect that he will come.  Their expectation makes them waiting.

Vladimir – Estragon - killing time in questions and conversation while waiting. It is an interesting sequence.

They try to go away but they can’t escape. They are representing human life. Vladimir is searching answer and remembering where as Estragon forget everything and busy to maintain his physical body. The central theme is killing time for unusual things.

In the middle end of the play Lucky and Pozzo comes. They are on behalf of master slave mentality. The obedience of Lucky is extremely irritating and nauseate.  Lucky’s behavior is abnormal. He is treating as pig by his master. He seems as wooden toy. When master Pozzo ordering to such things to do than he do and when he says stop than he stops. He is living like lifeless. He has nothing meaning for his life. Entering of Lucy and Pozzo is insignificant and meaningless. Why they come? What is the purpose of coming is uncertain.

At the end of first act a little boy cone to pass message of Mr. Godot. He speaks

 Mr. Godot told me to tell you he won't come this evening but surely tomorrow.

It signifies the endless tomorrow.  He gives very narrow answer to Vladimir. Then he runs away from there.  These represent as something hope is come in between and then it becomes a kind of glimpse for living life.

Act – 2

The beginning of both act is same, evening falls in to night and moon rises. It indicates the representation of nature. A few leaves grows it suggest the change of nature. Everything is goes on changing. It is for desire. In nothingness there is a meaning. Night indicates darkness of life but behind the darkness there is light. Sometimes waiting is nothing but sometimes it is reality of life.

Night – will night never come?

We are craving for salvation but it never comes on right time. When our goal is near to complete than it comes and provides hope for next one.

If we exchange both act than it doesn’t make any difference. Both acts are somewhere similar. Beckett understands the human life deep and then he wrote. The language is very simple and significant. Within a small sentence how message is conveying to audience or reader.

Again Estragon spends his time for sleeping. He does not care about other matter. He is busy with his life. He is forgetting everything. Vladimir was still waiting. When he feels loneliness at that time he wakes up to Estragon. They star quarreling each other and after sometimes the embrace. It means ultimately we have to do such things for permanent goal.

They are killing their time with questioning and moving. They decide to suicide but their body insists to live. Somewhere body is controlling our mind.

Again Pozzo and Lucky comes in second act. This time Pozzo is blind and Lucky is dumb. They are yet master slave. Vladimir ask are you same? But they denies. Their looks and name are same but the only different is that one is blind and another is dumb.

Pozzo asking for raise up and for the sake of humanity they help to rise but unfortunately one by one all falls down. They can rise up but they have not tried to rise up.

This time Pozzo is blind so Lucky has chance to run away but instead of that he gave his rope to master, Pozzo. He is still obeying his master. He has accepted everything.  He is making his master happy. His life has no meaning. He is living for master who is treating him as a pig. Totally the characters are despair.

Vladimir and Estragon want to know about these two but they fail. One way they are insignificant and another side it is a kind of human cycle that one after another man come and goes from life.
Pozzo and Lucky are ready to go away but Vladimir insists them to stay there because he wants to pass his time. Ultimately they go away and here still both are waiting with such expectation.
Same the boy come again for passing message. This boy is also same but refuse that he never comes before. He passed same message and then run away. What is the meaning of message? Hope or realty, message remain message still the end.

Life has no any meaning to live. Such question about life is uncertain. If we try to get answer then end never cone. Life is goes on adding.

Theater of the absurd

Critic Martin Esslin coined the term in hi 1960 essay “Theater of the Absurd”. He related these plays based on a broad theme of the Absurd, similar to the way Albert Camus uses the term in his 1942 essay, “The myth of Sisyphus”. The absurd of this play is man’s relation to world is meaningless. Man is a puppet controlled by invisible outside forces. Characters are caught to do repetitive or meaninglessness actions. The plot is cycle or absurdity.
Vladimir and Estragon control by invisible fear that is Mr. Godot and which itself absurd idea of Beckett to keep him center.

Existentialism in the play

This play is based on existentialism. The character like Vladimir and Estragon; why they are waiting? What is the meaning of time passes for unknown fellow? They can’t know about their life.
They are searching their self. What they are? Why they are here? They are suffering but still they are enjoying. They are accepting everything freely.

Lucky and Pozzo also try to find their self. They are roaming without meaning.
They are not free from fear. When the second time boy comes to pass message of Godot to Vladimir and Estragon at that time Vladimir speaks

Crist  murcy on us.

Still now they have expectation that Godot may come and may he have super natural power through which they can free from life. They are in such kind of ideology.

Search for the self

‘The Search for the Self’ essay by Martin Esslin on waiting for Godot. This play performed in front of arrested people. They are waiting for female character and it will not so then they want escape. The play performed well and audience likes it. They found their self in actor.
The language of play is simple but play was an esoteric. It’s totally on existential struggle. What is the reason behind human existence? In reality we all are searching our self in the world. The subject of the play is not Godot but waiting. This play is concern with the hope of salvation. (Esslin)

Conclusion

Thus the play is full of nothingness and meaninglessness. We can’t find a single point which is totally meaningful. Somehow character thinks that they are living happy life but they are threaten by invisible power structure. Waiting is meaningless and insignificant. They wait but nothing they able to achieve.

Works Cited

Beckett, S. (1950). Waiting for Godot. Amazon: Grove Press.
Esslin, M. (n.d.). The Search for the Self. Penguin Books, 1965 .